The great character debate
Wednesday, March 10th, 2010Just started a discussion on our social networking site (www.storyworld.ning.com) about characters. You may wish to sign up and join the debate.
It carries on from an earlier discussion about characters and deals with the ‘great’ character. Writers will differ on how to create characters, some will approach the task methodically with lists of background facts etc, others will hone in on the essence of a character. Both are right, most writers use a mixture of the two.
But what turns a character into a great character? For me, it is that the character dominates the stage whenever he or she is on it. And let me say straight away that a great character does not have to be a Hamlet or a Macbeth. It could be a humble person but one who is nevertheless a great character because they are so beautifully drawn. I am working with a writer whose central character is a meek, mild, almost fearful character, but by God, he dominates every stage he is on because he so real. And all those who have ‘met’ him love him for it.
And yes, I use the word stage advisedly. I know we are talking prose here but I always think that writers should approach their characters as if they were on a stage. Are they powerful enough to dominate the auditorium? Can they hold the audience? Does the audience (for which read reader) follow them wherever they go? Do they feel real? Do they feel as if they could knock on your door at any moment and walk in? Do you, the reader, believe?
There are so many things you could say about creating characters (anyone booking into our mentoring scheme will be sent a copy of our e-book on writing which includes some thoughts on characters) but the question is this. Have you created a great character, not a good one, but a great one who people will remember long after they have stopped reading the story?
And if so, introduce us to them!
John Dean



